I mean… Not really. But tbh, if anyone feels like “all nudity is bad” in America, it’s the GOP. So, there is significant irony in a party member potentially participating in dissemination - knowing the number of times any involvement in the past has been criticized on these very grounds.

This reminds me of the meat canyon Garfield.

“meow”

1. You’re really cool
2. I just wanted the “3” at the end - like 2023

I’m referring to the trend of posts criticizing (via memes) twitter screenshots. https://lemmy.world/post/1348807 https://sopuli.xyz/post/1213803 https://lemm.ee/post/1007393

it is essentially echoing ideas as old as twitter/reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/jeyscl/a_twitter_screenshot_is_not_a_meme/

I don’t have anything to add per se.

But I guess my question is - what does it matter insofar as using the software. It’s open source and intended for distrubuted use. So, the creators intentions are a bit… Irrelevant - no?

Best to separate the art from the artist so to speak. Otherwise, should we not save lives with immoraly gained medical insights, and not appreciate civil rights gains from an adulterer?

To me, it just came across as petulant. Ironically, the “conclusion” was basically a TLDR for anyone interested.

I’m honestly more curious about this than I was about any of the locked safes.