Umm there is a flood because water? /j
The statement itself is a comparison
The difference is that Biden did occasionally answer the question, and his answers were pretty good.
Did he? Were they? I couldn’t understand most of what he said because he was hoarse and lost his train of thought often enough that what I could make out was hard to follow.
No amphetamines
do NOT compare her to Obama - who was a master orator
The irony of this statement
This pic looks like he’s making a big steppy
It truly is, and I feel it every day.
Oh it absolutely is, and I appreciate the support. I think it’s a combination of being understaffed and being rushed to finish their route only to start it again.
You think they care that much? My time in a place with the policy had a flashlight shined in my face every time, because they were all too rushed to aim it properly.
And he has no qualms having done it, this despicable man.
Okay but you need to keep the philosopjer ruling class separate from the guard lower class.
I’m sorry I should put an /s at the end of that comment… That was meant to be sarcasm (hence the exclamations).
What do you mean negative expectation?
Foucault salivating involuntarily at this comment
Yep! Don’t forget, asking questions for clarity doesn’t exist, questions are for attacking! Any questions you ask are because you’re trying to subtly harass the person.
/s
That’s the same record I have for you!
So the lack of enforcement means what in this case?
On what scale? It seems like the current climate change issues were triggered and amplified before communism was practiced by any state, but while capitalism was actively being used by colonialists throughout the 1800s. Do we count those 100+ years without regulations? If the punishments are minimal, not a single violation of any environmental regulation on a large scale has been appropriately pushed in the leading capitalist state, the US, ever, do those regulations really mean anything to those that are truly the greatest impacts to environment?