If they removed that rule you would instantly realize why it was there in the first place.
If they removed that rule you would instantly realize why it was there in the first place.
Just so you know, we can tell you don’t know what any of that means.
Trump cannot drop out. As long as he’s alive, he’s running.
A replacement won’t have his cult following. But I agree, for his idiotic movement to die he needs to be on the ballot and he needs to lose.
Despite how much they go on about how nuanced and special their views are, libertarians will find a way to vote GOP like they always do.
Because most Americans support it.
Wasn’t it also for the fancy stuff that China is developing? Also this video doesn’t mean that Russia hasn’t produced better armour (they obviously have, that appears to be unhardened mild steel lol) , just that they can’t mass produce it.
We’re nearly at the point where Dems need to start running billboard ads like “your vote is yours and yours alone. No one can tell who you voted for”.
This empty-brained chud will 100 percent vote for Trump in November.
Charlize Theron is one of the most beautiful women of all time and won her Oscar for playing someone…not that. What I’m saying is that I honestly think Kathy Bates has the acting chops to pull it off.
Why are you like this
America has a cultural sickness. 2016 revealed that well enough for anyone who was still in doubt about it. And it’s not drag queens.
The wise thing is to not offer perpetual licenses in the first place. You can’t predict the state of your business in 10 years let alone beyond that. Why make commitments that? Marketing of course. So if they’re going to raise capital that way (by one-time revenue from sales of perpetual licenses) then they can’t just decide that perpetual doesn’t mean perpetual anymore. All in all this will come down to a legal duel between expensive legal teams.
Some people are able to understand context.
Given the state of Xitter, I would argue that his control of Starlink is significantly more dangerous.
First part of this is gibberish. Second part is just describing a short of the battery, which will destroy it, but is completely inconsistent with video footage which shows small high explosive charges going off. That is not how battery shorts happen. This was not done in software, there were actually explosives installed in the devices as reports are starting to now state. But you know, good job on the sheer volume of words you wrote.