Better not be. He’s 100% a corporate suit.
Better not be. He’s 100% a corporate suit.
No, watch, they’ll run someone like Gavin Newsom in 4 years.
Every time I see this headline I think it’s saying Jill Stein, and I’m very confused.
This headline, and others like it, that make him sound credible. Instead of “Trump lies about xxxxx” they make it sound like a difference of opinion.
In a contingent election, control of the House doesn’t matter, as each state gets one vote regardless of House delegation size. Interestingly, a majority of the state’s House delegation has to vote for the same candidate in order for that candidate to be awarded the state’s vote, so if a state with 2 House reps had each voting for a different candidate, that state doesn’t get counted.
“Where’d you learn that, drug school?”
The Onion is having a day.
Where is Lt. Aldo Raine when we need him?
I just stopped watering mine. I also live in an area where grass dies quickly without copious irrigation, which should have been the first clue to the previous homeowners to maybe not grow grass.
I fully support his being eligible to vote, regardless of past convictions, even if they were for treasonous, seditious behavior.
He should not be eligible to run for office.
Convicted felons should be eligible to vote, whether in prison or not, because as you said, anyone still affected by politics should have a voice. This also includes children, undocumented immigrants, and resident aliens. Anyone living here is impacted by the choices of our representatives and should therefore be able to vote for those representatives. Physical presence should be the only requirement.
Staying busy and avoiding news. It’s highly likely that it won’t be decisive, and we don’t need to feed the relentless hysterical coverage machine of media corporations.
As an outside observer, it seems perfectly clear that he has no intent to see any more hostages returned alive.
Oh, I’ve got plenty of leftover Halloween candy, conveniently.
But why Bernoulli?
Officials in Florida and Texas have said they won’t allow federal election monitors into polling sites on Tuesday. And on Monday, Missouri filed a federal lawsuit seeking a court order to block federal officials from observing inside polling places.
The Justice Department announced last week that it’s deploying election monitors in 86 jurisdictions across 27 states on Election Day. The Justice Department declined to comment on Monday on the Missouri lawsuit and the moves by other Republican-led states.
So, not being blocked yet, just announcing that they will try. How much do you want to bet that this is grandstanding by the state AGs? When the feds rock up to the volunteer county election officials with federal court orders to monitor polling and counting, you think the locals will refuse, in the face of felony charges? A few may, like that Kentucky county clerk who tried denying gay couples a marriage license post-Obergefell, but most won’t, despite what their state AG says, because they know they will be the ones facing charges, not the AGs.
The Election Research Institute is led by Heather Honey…
Based on their website, I’m pretty sure the Election Research Institute is Heather Honey.
Also does not include amounts. It’s easy to cause a spike in results when there aren’t many to begin with.