The entire point of a web browser is to allow scum to:

• endlessly throw loginwalls and paywalls at us

• load dodgy third party sites libraries

• insisting on kyc as an act to show and display continuous acts of compliance

So not surprising the linked site has either a login or paywall.

Forcing a phone number is kyc. kyc is obnoxious.

Thx for sharing

Stract on github

Can self host

The other suggestions aren’t suggestions at all. They are obsoleted by searx.space

DDG … obsolete

startpage.com … obsolete

Browsers have default search engines. Curse everytime, DDG is accidentally queried.

DDG is a curse word!

Any centralized site, with privacy claims, is treated as lying thru their teeth. Front run future news.

SHUM

Property owner rights do not magically override the 1A.

Property owners are welcome to write scary notices. They are just not legally enforceable.

my votes are for nusensor, popupblocker, dark reader, nuke anything

then someone with much more talent can step up, rename the plugin, and carry on.

The challenge is choosing the next maintainer user handle.

https://github.com/msftcangoblowm/sphinx-external-toc-strict

Good choice?

then someone with much more talent can step up, rename the plugin, and carry on.

The challenge is choosing the next maintainer user handle.

https://github.com/msftcangoblowm/sphinx-external-toc-strict

did he just out passive aggressive the Japanese?

Wait! So the author bows his head, says hey great guys u win. Watch i complied.

Leans over to the stranger sitting next to him and says, hold my beer.

In the same heartbeat, creates another git acnt, exact same commit history. And carries on. Some other author, totally not the same guy but oddly the same pgp public key announces they’ve taken over and here are the new urls.

i call that mission accomplished

this comment thread is like fight Money Mcbags and go bankrupt for our entertainment and for the LOLs and feelz good?

Or we can just post the new urls and pretend it’s a new maintainer, with the handle lawyerdisappointed

Putin should take a tour of adjacent countries. Dare them to blind.

No adjacent country would declare war by arresting a visiting head of state.

No country became a country by having that level of lack of strategy. Simply does not exist.

These judges also don’t live or conduct trade, especially with their neighbors being a global military power.

So these judges lack skin in the game. Asking Mongolia to arrest the leader of a neighboring country is the same as declaring war.

The media screaming they must do it, speaks volumes about their lack of IQ.

A FOSS app for digital payments, must have a company front to sign deals with country retail store chains. Although customer kyc can be avoided, the payments from the front company to retail chains would be thru a corporate structure.

… maybe convenience is the wrong path

The advantages of PoW crypto, over digital (and PoS), it’s possible to force between seller and buyer:

• communication with end-to-end encryption
• privacy oriented marketplaces

With the goal of fostering our own private communities. Over time, might spawn a sub-culture, identity, and ultimately people hood.

There was no signs of foul play at Wells Fargo?

Oh! It was the weekend

I hope this is sarcasm

Currently trying to improve a popular Sphinx extension, sphobjinv. Can watch my daily pain here

If anyone is so inclined, please throw some litecoin my way

Li1S1eZzPHBGyc2Lfx93kCohM5qGYGo924

The litecoin will go towards my daily milk tea habit. Elephants work for peanuts, i work for milk tea.

aGPLv3 is a good business model. If companies are using your kit in their closed source projects, they need to pay you

donationware is abandonware. We brand it Apache2.0 or MIT

AGPLv3 is not anti-business or anti-money. It’s saying if you want to use the code in a closed source project you need to pay the copyright holder

The copyright holder is the original author, not a maintainer or someone who forked a project and renamed it.

That’s why the #1 thing mentioned in copyleft licenses is you can’t alter the copyright notice and declare yourself the original author

AGPLv3 is a good license to choose. All the other licenses are naive and do not combat closed source projects and the slave worker that keeps our projects unfunded

Exactly. They obviously didn’t research licensing enough.

Closed source projects need to pay for licensing. Or they will force you to work for them designing web forms and smartphone apps

Am i wrong?

When is collaboration irrelevant within a large organization? Your company uses Linux which is commendable.

Taking it one step further

Multiple team members being able to work on the same project at the same time