I don’t understand why they’re bothering with this. Isn’t the Moba shooter genre already played-out? It felt like it was losing steam over 10 years ago when they dropped a sequel to Monday Night Combat that nobody asked for.
I don’t understand why they’re bothering with this. Isn’t the Moba shooter genre already played-out? It felt like it was losing steam over 10 years ago when they dropped a sequel to Monday Night Combat that nobody asked for.
Yeah, obviously I’d much rather that R&D budgets got spent on things that might actually make a difference rather than new ways of kicking the can down the road for future generations to deal with.
You’re weirdly defensive about this idea. What’s up with that? Daddy got some investments in the fossil fuel industry?
The root cause is immaterial, because those people don’t like Trump. They like an idea of who Trump is, an idea that is informed almost exclusively by PR teams and marketing campaigns.
The appropriate way to “deal with” people who are trapped in a media filter bubble is to ignore them. They are of no consequence until they try to leave their bubble and interact with those outside it, at which point they are forced to either come to terms with their deception or else double-down and retreat even deeper into it.
Because that would explain why you can’t smell the fascism in genocide…
Because that would explain why you can’t smell the fascism in genocide…
Because this “one trial” was the literal best-case scenario, and it still sprung a leak that would cost more to fix than they could gain by banking carbon sequestration credits.
This isn’t just one leak, this is a leak that got so bad the EPA got involved.
Do you have Covid?
And it’s backfiring, which is part of why the Democrats are going to win the presidency in this election.
We know the Democrats aren’t going to do anything to stop Israel, so the only real question left is whether or not the Republican party will fracture after Trump loses again.
I’m a single-issue anti-genocide voter. My political ideal is a mashup of Library Socialism and Anarchism. The election can’t be subverted, it’s already been decided that Harris is winning.
PBS SpaceTime has a video on that this week: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAtbzhpI4Js
I might as well have been quoting the wikipedia article:
I only have one vote for the Presidential seat and it is entirely symbolic because I don’t live in a swing state.
You say we need to capture the party, but I’m watching it be captured by “moderate” Republicans who suddenly seem very eager to endorse Harris.
This election didn’t have a primary, so it sounds like there never was a chance for a “real push”.
If we’re not allowed to be realistic about our expectations, then yes it very much is toxic positivity.
Discussing such activities is illegal in the USA.
“Those guys” are part of the problem, voting for them before they stop helping genocide the Palestinians does not incentivize them to stop being part of the problem.
My encouragement to you is to do more than just voting. It’s necessary but insufficient on its own.
You misunderstand, I’m trying to point out that a “Democracy” that offers only the illusion of choice is anything but.
There’s nothing anti-democratic about having a “dangerous” option on the ballot, but if there’s only one “safe” candidate then there is no real choice to be made and democracy is impossible.
It’s not new technology, for one. We’ve been using injection wells like landfills since the 1930’s because it’s cheaper than treating and disposing of wastewater safely.