thats what the article assuming Nvidia could do. Fusing off 4090 defeat the purpose of sending AD102 to China, if they do that they might as well send only AD103.
nothing stop nvidia underclocking 4090 by massive number & sell a clock speed limit 4090. I think Nvidia is going to do the unclocking path, letting the Chinese to OC it.
feels like only Qualcomm & Huawei among the 4 that is well ahead of everyone else.
At this point he might be moving even chip design out of US to avoid getting caught in geopolitical mess.
yup his GPU is actually holding back the i5 3470 lol
Something like 1650 will fix this problem or a Radeon RX560/RX460.
I am typing this post on my 2500K, and that is still my “fastest” desktop PC. :o
Nvidia and AMD should have allow AIB freedom to put whatever amount of Vram they like.
It use to be like this. We had 4GB GTX960, R9-285, gtx680/770, 8GB 290X.
Laptop use to have double of vram back in old days. Nowadays they have less than Desktop ones… zzz
I refuse to buy a 4060/4070 laptop because of 8GB vram, Laptop screen has since moved to 2560x1600p. There is no way 8GB is enough for a 1600p screen.
these companies they pre-order them, they arent like your average miners that go to AIB order a bulk like black market.
5950X3D
useless if it is only 1 chiplet, I dont think I want to deal with OS to decide which core I should use. 5950XD need to have 2 chiplet with 3d cache for scheduling simplicity.
It is kinda shame the ethernet for transferring digital AV signal never really take off.
We got HDMI, display port instead. It would be so much more simple if we can run internet & transfer AV in 1 single cable.
It is kinda shame the ethernet for transferring digital AV signal never really take off.
We got HDMI, display port instead. It would be so much more simple if we can run internet & transfer AV in 1 single cable.
ELI5,
why the cache/memory always seems to be on top of the processing chip, not bottom?
I find it quite strange nvidia didnt try to upsell it in Ada GPU, like only offer DP 2.1 on AD102, AD103. The lower end get support next gen.
also volume, something AMD is lacking to complete with Intel/Nvidia.
given how bad is SD 888, 8 Gen 1(samsung ver.) I am actually surprise qualcomm didnt port the 870 to TSMC 6nm call it 875. With 6nm that chip can push another step further b4 moving to 5nm/4nm.
what AMD need is to release HX version of laptop chip that come with 3D cache. (8 core version)
Right now they only offer 16 core version, which is super expensive. I dont know why AMD like to sand bagging these days it is not like they got majority market share.
And they got desktop version 7800X3D, these are selling cheaper than HX in laptop. Whats the reason holding back in 3D cache in HX line up?
wait a min, these are real dual core or just quad core APU with disabled units?
partition are only benefit for HDD for performance, SSD dont need such thing.
if you want your stuff separate, you can install everything into a custom folder in the ssd.
it will be the same 24GB of vram, use only for 5090. 5080 most likely gonna use GB203.
I wonder will Nvidia repeat 5060 with 8GB vram again or they going back to 192bit bus.
There is no point fusing off 4090 permanently down to 100CU, that is just wastage of silicon. At that point Nvidia might as well save the trouble, just ship a fully enabled super clock AD103 which is at 84CU, the performance is already very close.