I stated an assumption and was contributing to the conversation. Even if that assumption is incorrect, there’s no need to be a dick about it.
It seems like a larger atmosphere would result in a longer duration exposed to atmospheric drag, thus requiring more fuel to overcome it.
I assume it’s not just about the gravity, but also the much larger radius of the planet would mean much larger distance from the surface, and thus much more fuel needed.
I really should link people to this site more often. The author is 100% correct.
A graph view is largely superfluous 99% of the time.
The default difftool is vimdiff, which is not a GUI program. But no, the point of difftool is to iterate through files to diff and pass the different versions to an external program. There are many external CLI and TUI diffing programs. The point, though, is that the git CLI is still the driver of everything and you still have the full range of options available to git diff, rather than some GUI program being the driver, which are universally limited in what they can do.
Personally, I load regular git diff output into a vim buffer via :read. Unified diff is largely superior to side by side diffs, IMO, because most of the time, changes in one file are accompanied by changes in a number of other files, so it’s useful to be able to quickly follow a thread of changed calls or whatnot. And with unified diff output, you can see and manipulate hunks directly.
Not sure what you’re saying. Are you saying you need GUIs for diffs? Because that couldn’t be further from the truth. Unified diff itself is highly underrated (and my preferred form for many reasons), but even if you wanted side-by-side diffs, there are many ways of accomplishing that without a GUI. That’s the entire point of git difftool.
The git CLI. GUIs don’t get anywhere near what it can do, and the CLI is scriptable and can easily interop with other programs.
Obviously don’t have the full context, but rarely is it ever advisable to give third parties direct access to a database. There are many reasons for this, like, for example, the fact that doing so makes schema migrations practically impossible.
I think it’s great and really straightforward. it’s quite simply asking people to say yes or no to AI, and the response has been overwhelmingly no.
Except, unlike computers and the internet, AI is not essential, unless your whole business revolves around it (in which case, good riddance).