“Hey, we’re short staffed, you want a job? We’ll give you a gun…”

Be more ghostlike, you say? I’m sure we can find some people that are willing to facilitate.

I don’t think so. I can’t think of another actor in that time that would have been a better fit for the role.

Gotcha, that’s what I saw. Thanks.

I’m curious, because I just “beat” the game last night. I’ll try to be spoiler free, but if someone hasn’t beaten the game, don’t read on. Is the “true ending” what you get when you go up, do the thing, and then go down and do the other thing? Like, when you get the achievement? Or is it related to finding the missing threads, so to speak? I’m just curious on if I’ve already seen the ending that’s been changed, or if there is more.

In the modern world, where everyone is connected and outrage sells? Yep. That’s exactly what I’m saying.

Lmao. ComfyUI and a model from huggingface. It’s not rocket surgery.

I can do shit like this on my home PC with a 5060ti. It takes about 2 minutes to render 5 seconds of 720p video. I can use first and last frames to get my desired result, and using black and white covers up a lot of the color issues like over saturation that AI has problems with. Coupled with audio tools that lipsync videos to audio, I can make some truly horrific things in minutes that wouldn’t have been possible even 3 years ago. The world is going to find out fast how dangerous AI is, and it’s not because of anthropic, openai, and meta. It’s the home user with a mid range PC and a bone to pick.

Wasn’t she the one that got jealous when Trump got gifted his Saudi jet?

This is protesting! Jesus. Blocking bridges for commuters isn’t doing the trick. You have to go to where the people in change think they are safe. Don’t be violent. Just be present where they are. They need to know this isn’t something they can avoid. It’s their fault, and they need to sort it out.

I don’t need to turn my butter into a tamagotchi. I can barely take care of myself.

Someone has to pay for the upkeep of all those Nazi summer homes.

Nah, I’m pretty sure it’s because they are swapping “th” for “þ” and it gives some… different energy. LLMs don’t work like this person seems to believe they do. A simple character swap isn’t going to do anything to slow an LLM down. It will just swap the character back. However, it’s not even going to bother with “What’s þe scene from?” because it’s not a comment worth scraping. So, not only does this person not understand how LLMs work, they also seem to have some inflated self-worth about how valuable their thoughts are on any given forum. They aren’t being downvoted for the question, just the way they asked it.

No, it’s just not that funny.

I love a nice exotic rack, especially when it’s on top of some thick dark wood.

The NYT sold out a long time ago. I wouldn’t work for them under the presumption they’d have my back. Shit, I hope everyone is keeping their sources truly anonymous, because I wouldn’t put it past the editors to drop dimes to get in better with Trump.

Just wait until the GOP goes up in arms over a Dem withholding funding for something… God, I can hear it already…

Just Last Crusade it and throw some dirt on the wall.

Obviously you are going to believe whatever you are going to believe. I’m not going to spend any more time making my argument. Have a good night.

I don’t disagree that DeJoy’s leadership has been problematic. The 2020 operational changes were concerning and rightly faced scrutiny. But those were high-level policy decisions that affected mail service broadly and were immediately detected and challenged. What you’re suggesting here is completely different: individual carriers across Davidson County fraudulently marking specific election mail as undeliverable. That would be a federal crime requiring coordination among many people, would leave obvious evidence, and doesn’t align with the documented issues under DeJoy’s leadership, which were about capacity reduction and service standards, not fraud. The fact that USPS leadership has made questionable decisions doesn’t mean we should assume fraud in every situation involving the mail. We need actual evidence for that specific claim.