laughs in Hungry Jacks

Nominative determinism?

From the thumbnail I thought it was gonna be this

VFX unionization has been suppressed for decades through a consistent level of FUD and a constant race to the bottom-style system that has been fully supported, encouraged and enforced by the big studio clients.

It’s barely even worth linking that “life after pi” docu-short about Rhythm&Hues at this point, as the same thing has happened again and again since then.

It would be nice if this marks some kind of sea change, but I wouldn’t hold my breath just yet.

“Attention all shoppers. If you have a sweet tooth, we have a special treat for you. If your purchases in the next half hour amount to five dollars or more, we’ll give you a bag of hard candy free! For the kiddies, or enjoy yourself. So hurry and do your shopping!”

There was my “hanging-out-with-Ravi-Shankar” phase, followed by the “carbohydrate, sequined-jumpsuit, waking-up-in-a-pool-of-your-own-vomit, bloated-purple-dead-on-a-toilet” phase, the “finding Bugs Bunny attractive when he put on a dress and played a girl bunny” phase, to name just a few.

Can’t say I’d recommend any of them, in retrospect.