…like trying to get people to change their habits without shaming them maybe?

Why don’t we stop subsidizing disgusting slop before more state enforcement?

The article is literally not saying healthcare is “the problem” or that you should “just die.” It’s just talking about how it’s unfortunate that something people need to live can have a negative effect on the environment and talking about ways to mitigate that by changing the way they’re manufactured. It doesn’t say to stop using them or whatever.

Edit: Cool edit, 100x worse

You went from misinterpreting it as saying something it wasn’t to straight up telling people not to get diabetes and that the state should enforce nutrition. What the fuck is wrong with you people?

I’m 20 and I can’t drive

you’re not supposed to buy you must steal the friend

“yeah you’re right but can you be right more quietly, there’s other things to be right about”

Really bizarre honestly. This is just how meme culture is, kinda. It’s whatever’s culturally relevant, and Taylor Swift is culturally relevant.

Right, they just crawl out of the sewer somewhere, real productive analysis man.

“lmao yeah just murk people who haven’t actually done anything”

violence is sometimes necessary

You fight the Nazis when they’re actively literally killing people, or imminently threatening to, yes. Notice how that is an action, not ideology.

Do you suggest actually just going after people who are ideologically fascist regardless of what they have or have not actually done?

My opinion is that only selfishness is legitimate. Again, give me a reason why not to. I care about my friends and family because I’m alive and get to experience the connection. I care about living in a safe society, and hopefully one that will treat people less fortunate, as I feel I have been given a shitty hand in many regards. This is all self interest. That all goes away when I die.

Edit: Also miss me with this “would die for my principles” shit. You’re literally defending dying for something you don’t agree with.

It’s not that in either case the entire movement was especially authoritarian in their time periods and settings, it’s just that you’re willing to let people literally infringe on your right to live if it vaguely is in service of “the people.” If the world was against me, maybe I’m just an asshole, but I still have to fight for what I believe to be my best interest. Do I have any reason to do anything else?

Doesn’t matter who said that violence is sometimes necessary that still isn’t a valid response to “maybe let’s not just kill people on an ideological basis”

Authoritarian social revolution is absolutely tankie shit, they’re proud of it.

Then why are there tons of people defending it?

“Authoritarianism is cool when “the people” are doing it”

How does being “executed as reactionaries” help anyone? Once you’ve gained social power you shouldn’t need to execute anyone for their beliefs, and you need that social power to execute in the first place.

“Guys Mao Zedong said violence is cool, so we can just start murking people for any reason”

So you guys aren’t even upvoting this like “bro it’s obviously a joke” you’re upvoting like “yeah no I think we should just murder people who do bad things sometimes, maybe even pretty often.”

Put me in thought prison instead of real prison at least