Almost feels like he was reading a telepromter that had split the word “mig-rants” across two lines
Almost feels like he was reading a telepromter that had split the word “mig-rants” across two lines
They say supercomputer, but do they count Google/Amazon datacenters or just “named” supercomputers like the DoE’s scientific clusters?
AWS surely has more total compute capacity across its many datacenters
Water is another issue for xAI. Data centers use massive amounts of water to cool their servers; xAI says it will need 1 million gallons of water a day
“It would put stress on the wellfield,” says Scott Schoefernacker, science director for Protect Our Aquifer. He adds that “a lot of the water is just being used as cooling and it evaporates.”
Presumably it’s for evaporative cooling towers? I can’t imagine they’re heating it up from ambient and dumping it down the drain.
They actually never talk about Palestine, or even Israel. Only American politicians and parties.
Calling voters murderers is an outstanding electoral strategy
I liked Ralph Nader. I voted for him. George Bush barely won that election, and then started the “global war on terror”, instituted the PATRIOT act, etc.
I learned.
The more you repeat this, the more clear it is you have a very childish understanding of electoral dynamics and voter motivations.
Yes, that’s definitely a relevant and insightful comparison to the US electoral system.
This is like saying the dude blocking traffic by wandering around in the street ranting to himself is a “threat to the automobile industry’s power so they must be afraid of him”.
Weird thing to say about a group that routinely takes majorities in national elections.
Surely a party that, on a good day, gets 1% of the vote, and on a bad day, can’t manage to file the right paperwork to get on the ballot, is really what the people want.
You might get invited to the party if you didn’t hiss “you’re committing genocide” at ‘chad’ and ‘stacy’ every time you passed them.
Implicit in “profit so much that money becomes trivial” is that they think this tax rate should apply to very high profit businesses/individuals.
In fact the US’ top tax rate was 90% for almost a decade and over 70% for 40 years - during a time many would consider “golden years”.
They could have worded their statement better though.
That’s an interesting possibility - is there any data to support it?
Here in Georgia the fight is in the center, for sure.
What’s good is that it might get them in office so they can continue making incremental progress.
I got a heat pump this year because of the $3000 tax credit they passed - no chance of more incentives like that under Trump.
Gleefully?
I wouldn’t know, my instance doesn’t do downvotes
You have to explicitly check if the return value is an error and propagate it. You write the same boilerplate
if (err) return err
over and over again, which just litters your code.
That’s only true in crappy languages that have no concept of async workflows, monads, effects systems, etc.
Sad to see that an intentionally weak/limited language like Go is now the counterargument for good modeling of errors.
The big difference between Ellison and Ware is that Ellison can actually represent his constituents’ interests, because he has constituents.
The Green Party trifecta of Divisive, Unpopular, and Incompetent means they are never in a position to represent anyone.