https://www.google.com/search?q=Hillary+Clinton+visiting+a+working+class+family's+home+in+East+Harlem&udm=2

“In The Midst Of Unpopular, Catastrophic War Of Choice, Trump Allies Call For Draft” would perhaps not be a totally neutral headline but I feel like it would be more honest, more forthright.

They say the empty can rattles the most.

We, the American people, elected the empty can. How can we look ourselves in the mirror ever again, unless we make ourselves just as empty?

“This allows us to integrate freeform electronics onto a broad range of substrates, including biopolymers and living biological tissue, all within a desktop-size printer without the needs of complex facilities or labor-intensive manual processes.”

Think of the conspiracy theories we got for the COVID vaccine. Now, think bigger.

There’s been so much inflation that $3/gallon would be really cheap, even for gasoline in the US, by the standards of the last 20 years or so. A very arbitrary number to get stuck on.

US Average Gasoline Price Adjusted for Inflation

$4/gallon just isn’t that high, not much out of line with the last ~15 years.

I think higher fuel prices could be the impetus for quite a lot of alternative energy, alternative transport, and electrification investment. I think if you believe that free markets work, you’d really have to agree.

She’s a terrible rep, she sounds like a tasteless, exhausting, stupid person, yet she does not stand accused of victimizing anyone the way, say, Swalwell is.

So her stance here may be what some would call “ironic,” but I don’t think its hypocritical.

“Look what you made me do” is an abuser’s refrain.

You have to let me bring them into the store, they’re my emotional support wolves

Why weren’t they going after this 10 years ago? I think I’ve just gotten into the habit of “open in new tab” because I know there’s a good chance “back” won’t do what I want.

Frankly, here on PieFed, “back” to a feed isn’t very useful, because you’ll just land somewhere in the feed, not back to the place where you started. “Open in new tab” solves that as well, for certain very small values of “solves.”

It is a pastiche of [thing], more than an actual [thing] itself.

This is exactly what “AI” does, this is precisely what it’s for

I feel like this is ripe for an “Autotune The News” treatment. I’m thinking Eminem’s “Without Me:”

🎵

I have two Microsoft Outlooks, Outlooks
Neither of 'em works
Neither of 'em works

🎵

An unnamed source told the Post it was like “hearing a voice in a stadium, except the stadium is a thousand square miles of desert.”

What the hell is this analogy? “It’s like [thing], except if [thing] were totally different.” This is like a bad movie script.

To find a heartbeat, a quantum Ghost Murmur tool would have to contend not just with Earth’s magnetic field and magnetic noise from natural and human-made electric currents but also with “the heartbeats of the sheep and dogs and jackrabbits—whatever else is running around out there,” says Chad Orzel, a professor of physics…

I’m glad someone brought this up, it was the first thing that came to my mind.

Years ago I when I wrote software for a living, I had an argument with a colleague, and I tried to explain to him:

The “supported” closed-source library he wanted to use was pretty popular because it was marketed by a huge company with a marketing department, or because it had a first-mover advantage, or because there were training events and books built around it, etc.

The unsupported free open-source library I wanted to use was the most popular library of its kind in the whole world. And it got to that position without any of those advantages.

What does that suggest about their relative usefulness? The world of open source is closer to being a real meritocracy. The number one app or library is probably number one for non-structural reasons.

internet bluetooth wife

My new punk band name

Q: So do you have any hobbies?

A: Well lately I’ve really gotten interested in routing VGA through unusual items!

Q: Ooooh, that’s so hot right now

…like, how sexy are we talking?