They didn’t say “I can’t use the railway” they said “the railway doesn’t run to [place the railway definitely runs to]”
But the person in the original comment is wrong. “The software and driver support isn’t there” means that appropriate software does not exist. If they were being honest they would have said “Ableton doesn’t support Linux and I want to stick with Ableton so it doesn’t work for me.” Their inaccurate comment could discourage people who do not have a strong preference toward Ableton from trying Linux.
Probably not, but it’s also shorthand for something everybody understands, even the bazinga-brained, so it’s not hard to clarify
Is this actually true in the way that is intuitive or is it true in the same sense that if you have a petri dish with cancerous cells in it you can kill them with a handgun
No dude, the point is that half-measures and baby steps aren’t enough. Our planet is quickly becoming uninhabitable for us. We need radical change.
Where did she think the other hole was
utorrent
piratebay
There are a million good programs and services out there, why use the ones that are completely shit in every way
I found a two civil cases where people were physically detained after refusing to show their receipt.
But I’m pretty sure that isn’t a civil issue. That’s a whole bunch of crimes, involving the violence committed in the process of detaining you and the kidnapping / imprisonment itself. What happens when you call the cops and say “this person tackled me leaving the store and accused me of theft, here is my receipt”
I mean it’s a cop so you never know, but what’s supposed to happen is that guy gets arrested for the unlawful violence he committed against you, and like definitely 1000% fired at least because every store has a policy against that shit
Backpack licenses
I already paid, this is my stuff, they shouldn’t be able to detain me without suspicion I stole something.
They can’t. That would be mega illegal. All they can do is ask you to stop and show your receipt, and you can just ignore them and keep walking. Or if you’re feeling extra polite, say “have a nice day” and keep walking.
If I ever encountered a voice comment in code I would immediately track that motherfucker down and do terrible things to them
Depends who’s asking
Of course liberals support capitalism and cannot be socialist. The problem is that capitalist is simply not the word for someone who supports capitalism in the same way that socialist is the word for someone who supports socialism. It’s an unintuitive language quirk, but not a unique one.
If we were to redefine capitalist to mean “everyone who supports capitalism” we need a new word for what capitalist means. And considering “everyone who supports capitalism” is a group consisting basically only of liberals and fascists, I don’t see why such a word is necessary. 99% of the time you would use this redefined form of capitalist, liberal would be sufficient.
I suspect that you are a pig with shit on its balls
Not generally. The capitalist class is a specific thing, it’s not based on vibes.
You’re not a capitalist, you’re just a lib bootlicker
Capitalists don’t waste their time defending capitalism online, they’re busy doing drugs and pretending to work
And also the other half
Death to amerikkka
Why is it not religious and only cultural?
I don’t know, that’s literally my question.
I haven’t yet seen evidence they wouldn’t.
Are you telling me that they have one garment considered modest and all other clothes on earth are immodest?
Edit: also I understand your point but personally I’d fit in just fine in cartoon bear culture, I don’t need pants