I don’t know what they have posted, but the way this comm is being moderated has been questioned by other people, too. There’s no reason to ban someone for having a different opinion (let alone with your sentence which is offensive). As others have already said, this serves more the individual and subjective worldview than any comprehensible set of rules.
DHS Says China, Russia, Iran, and Israel Are Spying on People in US with SS7
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) believes that China, Russia, Iran, and Israel are the “primary” countries exploiting security holes in telecommunications networks to spy on people inside the United States, which can include tracking their physical movements and intercepting calls and texts, according to information released by Senator Ron Wyden.
… conspicuous consumer culture that capitalism fosters
This is about Shein, Temu, Tiktok, all from a ‘socialist’ China.
Edit: since you decided to be cringe instead of amicably taking the suggestion, I’m just going to ban you.
What happens here?
Thanks for this. I’m aware of the entire theory and the movements they refer to it (justified and unjustified :-)) It’s a very broad interpretation for a comm imho, but it’s fine. Thanks again.
Ramaswamy Once Called DOGE Partner Elon Musk a ‘Circus Monkey’ for China – (Archived)
According to recordings and social media posts […], Ramswamy once described Musk […] as a puppet of the Chinese government.
“I think Tesla is increasingly beholden to China,” Ramaswamy said in 2023. “I have no reason to think Elon won’t jump like a circus monkey when Xi Jinping calls in the hour of need.”
In another 2022 interview, the businessman-turned-Republican politician said that “Elon Musk has, I think, demonstrated his willingness to change his political tunes based on the favors that he gets to be able to do business in China.”
That same year Ramaswamy bashed Musk after the Tesla owner suggested that Taiwan should become a “special administrative zone” of the Chinese government. Ramaswamy criticized the comment, telling the UnHerd podcast that Musk “got a nice ‘attaboy’ […] a little pat on the back when his Shanghai factory and regulator in China gave him a nice little tax break within days after him having made that comment about Taiwan.”
In that same interview, Ramaswamy said that Musk — and Apple CEO Tim Cook — were beholden to the “same master”: The Chinese Communist Party.
[…]
Just a question: What has this post to do with “Socialism”?
There are many others (beehaw.org/post/17824016, for example) like this. I don’t question most of their content or the source, but they just don’t seem to fit into this community. This has nothing to do with the topic imo. What to I get wrong here?
I don’t know what Satoshi had in mind when they wrote their paper, but at least today I would view crypto money as complementary currencies rather then a replacement of fiat money. We should create a decentralized economy with a wide range of currencies -fiat and complementary money as well. Whether or not the crypto money will run on blockchains doesn’t matter, but it is one technology that seems to be fit for a lot of use cases to solve payment issues imo.
Yeah, but Cloudlfare is also a MiTM.
If I use a third-party for delivering my service or product, you may assume that I am also responsible for the their mistake because it effects my own offering.
Here is the blog entry by Cloudflare itself:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-incident-on-november-14-2024-resulting-in-lost-logs
This is another weird comment by the same mod in this community. The I-am-right-and-everyone-else-is-wrong stance is not a good foundation for any community imho.