That guys’ as well.
Ok, so here is a question: What’s with her right hand? I could swear I have seen this gesture in other paintings before. Is this some sort of artist custom?
Just try, what is the worst that could happen? Hehe-- [sound of breaking bones and rupturing organs]
Oni would be great, problem is the rights to it are split between like five different studios and it’s effectively abandoned. It’s why it’s not on GOG, Steam, etc.
Possibly the same situation for Attack of the Saucerman. Dayum.
It also wouldn’t surprise me if the source code has been completely lost, meaning there’s no chance of an HD upscale or anything.
Oh well, realistically, an upscale and a few improvements wouldn’t have cut it anyway.
Was it an intended pun?
Unfortunately, no.
Yet I think that had Judaism been more proselytist, it would have gained more followers and, probably, been more fanatical and aggressive.
Yes, that’s what I’m counting on, since I assume that ideas like religions take part in a long-term process of evolution. Unfortunately, the most whackiest, edgiest religions seem to be the most fit. Therefore my answer to the top level post.
I never said brainwashing children was ok as far as I can recall.
Fair enough, you didn’t. I apologize. I lost track of the chain of posters and mixed you up with the first poster who didn’t seem to recognize the dangers of passing belief to children.
As for Judaism, I stand by what I said: it’s not proselytist in the way other religions are, trying to convert other people. I don’t judge it as bad or as good, I don’t care. I just state a fact as I’ve seen/read.
That may be case. Which is possibly why, historically speaking, Judaism doesn’t seem to be on the winning side. Which is bad, because it means opportunities for more fanatical, agressive religions.
That’s not proselytising, it’s a while different thing
I don’t see your point. How is brainwashing children ok when wololo-ing people is not? Even from an egocentric perspective, you have to live in a society.
Pretty sure you can be born into judaism, though. Chances are, it is even the default scenario with even semi-religious parents.
That’s not “keeping to yourself” to me. That’s like passing the cigarettes to your kids.
If religious can keep to themselves
Since religions compete, that doesn’t sound feasible.
On second though, it doesn’t seem like a big improvement. Reminds me a bit of limbfeeders without limbs.
This, it would be less deep in the uncanny valley without eyes at all.
Git, probably
Good idea. Unfortunately this depends on self-regulation.
This and also
By “porn”, I suppose you mean nudity?
Please clarify, OP, did you mean
?
What about square screens?
inb4 chaotic neckpain
I’m glad it doesnt.