I know you can manage to disagree with people without calling them names, even if they’re annoying
I can, but at some point, people who repeatedly refuse to extend honest discussion back no longer deserve the effort on my part.
I know you can manage to disagree with people without calling them names, even if they’re annoying
I can, but at some point, people who repeatedly refuse to extend honest discussion back no longer deserve the effort on my part.
“almost a sixth”. Lmao
Yeah, nobody is surprised that you want more censorship
Why are you stepping in the moderate on a community you aren’t in on an instance you aren’t on?
Lmao nice slate of basically every partisan rag that leans in your favor
This is just overwhelmingly false on just about every manner. Try getting your information from somewhere other than r/politics
Just saying “literally” doesn’t make your lies true
I don’t really see a need to explain basic logic to someone from the furry porn instance
I wish they just linked the actual rankings rather than just writing it up. Because, for instance, they point out incarceration for violent and property crimes as a mark against Texas. Is it really against any valuable definition of personal freedom that you can’t murder, rape, and steal with impunity? And the article doesn’t bring up guns whatsoever. I would find it strange if that wasn’t included at all.
Overall, I usually just find indexes like this to be pretty worthless since they’re never all that transparent about exactly what influences the outcome, and how much. They should be able to back up each and every score with specific legislation that influenced it, and exactly how much (and why) it impacted the overall score.
Yeah, believe it or not, people are allowed to hold different values and make different judgements than you
Almost like there’s some middle ground to be had. Not at the absolute center of everything, but still within reasonable proximity.
Since your response is somewhere in the lemmy void of inaccessible comments, the reason i prefer it is because I have little interest in the community shit you’re talking up, especially considering the tradeoffs where it’s harder and more expensive to travel by car, and I can’t just own my own little chunk of land to live on as I please.
I didn’t serve you anything
Yeah, sorry, I forgot you’re just here to run defense for all the garbage the democrats want to shovel onto us. My bad
Unless you just had your rates in the absolute shitter beforehand, you have very low standards for what a decent discount is, especially when you consider that you’re normalizing them taking an overwhelming amount of data about you to create future insurance profiles for everyone.
Yeah, I’ll take the first any day.
The explanation is that I don’t give a fuck about race, and don’t consider disparate outcome to be an issue, nor a symptom of disparate policy. You’re the one who’s decided that race is what you want to obsess over. Not me
No, your obsession with race, and assumptions that everyone else just must be as obsessed as you is the only interesting thing here
I get good insurance rates, and I told them to stuff it when they “offered” to spy on me wherever i go.
And lmao that you actually think “good driving” and “driving favored by insurance actuaries” are even remotely the same.
I mean there’s not much to say. You’re basically just trying to explain that you didn’t serve me a plate of human shit, it’s actually dog shit, from only purebred poodles. Cool distinction, I still don’t want to eat shit.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣