Jack Horner did that in Puss in Boots 2: “Excalibur! I couldn’t get this rock off of it, but it’s still pretty cool, right?”

If there’s nothing about wikipedia you find objectionable, why are you objecting to it?

It’s suspicious because you denied an explanation nobody had yet asked for. If you ask me to lend you a shovel, that’s fine, but saying “don’t ask me why” makes me think you killed someone.

We kinda need to ask you why, though. If we’re gonna figure out a website you’d prefer to wikipedia, then we need to know what it is in wikipedia you object to. Plus, it’s more than a little suspicious to dodge questions of why before anyone asks.

You know those people who have no creative skills or drive, but want to be thought of as a creative?

You know those people who have this really neat idea for an app, but they don’t plan on making it themself because they’re “just an ideas guy”?

You know those people who will offer to pay in exposure? I mean, do you really need to be paid just to draw some pictures anyway?

You know those guys who send you a picture they got from google images and claim this to be a girl they know?

That’s the vast majority of the AI audience. I could probably sum that up with the word “parasite”, but I wanted to be thorough.

oh no

Nah, this is meant to be a negative consequence. Cutting Heroes down to one season would be a whole dang wish on its own.

Granted. The show was now cancelled after season 2, so it ends on a massive cliffhanger that goes unresolved forever.

Please actually read someone’s comment before summarising it. You’ll do a better job if you do that.

Bush has done a terrible deed that Trump did not have the opportunity to do. Trump has done multiple terrible deeds that Bush DID have the opportunity to do.

Saying Trump is better than Bush is like saying I’m a better friend to you than that burly sailor. Sure, I didn’t sleep with your mother, but we know damn well that I would have if I had the chance.

Yes, Trump hasn’t killed a million people. Trump was not the president in the days after 9/11, where the majority of americans supported a war on Iraq. Trump did not have the same opportunity to kill a million people that Bush did.

However, we can see Trump’s opinions on Palestine. We can see Trump’s opinions on Ukraine. We can see just as much malicious support of genocide as Bush had, if not more. The only difference is the opportunity to act on it.

So I won’t use the Iraq war as a marker of morality. That’s not a fair comparison.

I will instead judge them based on a situation that both of them had, where only one of them took it. Bush had the opportunity to cheat on his wife and embezzle campaign funds to hide it. Bush had the opportunity to hide government secrets in his private residence. Bush did not do these things.

Please note that being better than Trump is such a fucking low bar, it’s astonishing you think that means I’m saying Bush isn’t a piece of shit. Less repugnant than Trump is still fucking repugnant.

Trump has not been in a situation where he can declare war on Iraq. He has been in a situation where he can threaten to pull support from Ukraine if they don’t help him rig an election, and has said Biden is too hard on Israel. So they’re the same on morals in that regard, if not opportunities.

But both of them have been in elections. So with the same baseline situation, Trump is worse.

Good man? No. Better than Trump? Yes. That is not a high bar. As far as I am aware, Dubya didn’t cheat on his wife with a pornstar, then embezzle money to silence so he could win an election, all the while talking about taking advantage of his fame so he can molest women.

No sane person can listen to a second of Trump and call him less evil than anyone. Anyone who votes for him is voting for a fascist state, and you’re not fooling anyone by pretending you’re not.

They’re asking for things they can do, so I’m assuming they’re able to do things. So if they have the ability to do something, they have the ability to go and get help. It’s not a motivation issue.

My issue is they’re asking a question they know the answer to, but they want a different answer. And it’s not the first time they’ve done that.

No, I know it’s a difficult journey. My bestie struggled with hers for a long time. But she wasn’t defined by her depression. She went and got help to deal with it. Even with help, she still struggled, but less than she would have otherwise.

Meanwhile, this person has a solution in front of them, and they spend more time coming up with reasons it won’t work than actually trying to do it. Help IS available, as people keep pointing out. Heck, last time they posted something like this, I responded with a list of support hotlines by region on wikipedia.

As far as I can see, the only think stopping them from getting help is themself. So they need to get over that obstacle.

You post stuff like this a lot. You keep talking about being lonely, or about being sad, or things in that same spiral. You clearly know what the answer is, but you refuse to listen to it or accept it, but you STILL ask the question. At a certain point, I have to wonder if you LIKE being miserable.

As harsh as it is to say, I think you need to get over yourself.

Get help. If you can’t afford a pro, get an amateur to talk to. There are low-cost helplines and support groups around the world. Don’t just come up with a reason why you can’t do it. You can. All that remains is whether or not you will.

Actually, no. Monkeys paw grants the wish as stated, but in a way you didn’t want. It’s not “your wish comes true, and also this terrible thing”, it’s “a terrible thing happens and, as a result, your wish comes true.”

Granted. The chef accidentally knocked over his rack of hot sauces while cooking, and all of them mixed together on your chicken. No, the flavours don’t work well together. It’s spicy, but not actually tasty.

Oh, and it’s not free either. And given the cost of all the hot sauces…

Okay, you’re clearly not even reading your OWN comments now, so I don’t know why I expected you to read mine. You clearly don’t want people to respond to you, so I won’t. Goodbye.

You made the bold claim that a system could be designed to prevent cheating, then asked if a meritocracy could exist. I said no. I also backed up my claim with actual reasoning, while you just stuffed your fingers in your ears and made loud noises.

Did you actually WANT people to respond to you, or did you just want people to agree with you? Because we don’t.

There are options other than “meritocracy” and “nothing”, you know. It’s worrying that didn’t occur to you.