Because most disagree that it isn’t real. Aetheism is by no means a common outlook

Sorry to burst your bubble but POTUS is a management position. You oversee millions of jobs as the head of the Executive branch.

It is a job that the vast majority do not have the skills or temperament to manage with any degree of competence. The plantation owner who oversaw the hundreds of jobs/slaves of the past might have been able to be the head of a smaller and weaker government but the modern farmer isn’t going to have skills that transfer to POTUS.

The reason why it’s finance, politicians, and lawyers that end up in the job is those are the fields whose skills actually do transfer.

POTUS isn’t an entry level job. You should have governmental experience and a history of managing large organizations.

They did and I thought it was new back then but I was wrong.

It’s like “bet” in that I thought that was also newer when it came back until I watched Eddie Murphy hosting SNL for the first time and he used it in the monologue.

*11 as you cannot fluently speak Latin as many pronunciations aren’t likely accurate to the time.

Was Spez the one backing crypto? I thought that was Alex Ohanian the other living founder.

Technically all sex outside of marriage is verboten.

Cool beans comes from the 1960s or earlier.

Charisma

Charisma

POTUS shouldn’t be an entry level job.

No they didn’t. That was the result of years of absolutely moronic economic and monetary policy combined with a ton of theft by people at the top levels of government and the national oil company.

The USA isn’t helping Venezuela’s government to steal from it’s people since they stopped getting a cut.

Im not a troll you just do not seem to understand how to have a discussion.

Perfect tagline

Just do a single track of a Dead show that goes in and out of Space. Pretty sure you can hit an hour easily if not two that way.

More likely trying to enable democracy and a functional economy to once again exist in Venezuela.

Your source only talks about Israelis training Americans. It never mentions at any point Americans training Israelis

You literally suggest Americans trained Israelis and now that isn’t true you are claiming you said the opposite.

There is also ones for other languages.

Regardless the point is a dictionary does not define words but rather describes how they are used. Even if it covered national militaries, which it does not, it wouldn’t support your claim. In fact it would be an “appeal to authority”

You’ll note nowhere on that list of synonyms are terms used for militaries. That’s not by accident. It’s because national militaries aren’t terrorist groups.

4chan’s /a/ board isn’t good anymore? ;)