You’re like the third person in 24 hours that is unable to back up any of their assertions with sources.
Are you saying I’m a liberal? Or are you saying the other person is a liberal? It’s late, been a long day, and I’m kinda high right now.
I’m not saying “trust me bro”. I’m saying go ahead and use google on your own time. I’m not interested in convincing you. I stated my opinion and explained it. If you want to do something with that go ahead. If not, then I simply don’t care. I don’t know how I can say this more plainly.
I’ve seen how you engaged the other person who gave you the link to the video. I can tell how entrenched you are in your beliefs that you will nitpick your way out of anything. I’ve also noticed how you will not back up your own claims with “sources”. Because you aren’t actually interested in “sources”. You are simply using that as a lazy excuse to avoid having a normal discussion with someone, like a normal person would.
Lol alright buddy. You are the one to talk about tone policing.
If you make claims it’s your duty to back them up and defend them. If you don’t want to, then don’t lie tk begin with.
I didn’t lie. You merely don’t want to believe me. Which is fine by me. I have no obligation to convince you otherwise. The world doesn’t spin around you.
can’t even give a single link
I’m not here to hold an academic discussion, or waste my time arguing with debatebros. You were shown a link already, and it’s pretty clear you aren’t actually interested in it. Why would I send you more links?
Please, don’t pretend you are here to debate in good faith. From your tone it’s pretty clear whatever I link to you, no matter where it comes from will be dismissed. I’m not going to waste my time thusly. Believe what you will. It is obvious that is what you wish and no matter what I say or show will convince you otherwise.
I’m not about to go on a 30-minute search online, only for you to come back and dispute it non-chalantly. If you are interested, find the full video, and the context behind it. This topic has been broadly covered.
Literally check the comment below you.
He was on camera bragging at a public event how he blackmailed the Ukrainian government to fire Burisma’s prosecutor, while his son was a board member. The emails and witness testimonies are pretty conclusive.
There’s plenty of evidence. The problem is 1. Lack of political will to actually do anything substantial about it and 2. This is merely a political cudgel for the elections. The Republicans are using the impeachment in a cynical way to scare their potential voters back in line, and to keep discussion around Biden’s corruption going. A trick they aptly learned from the Democrats.
After the elections, whoever loses will be crying how the election was stolen from them, and the cycle will begin anew.
Btw, this is exactly how Roman politics devolved during Julius Caesar’s time and how they ended up with the dissolution of the republic by Octavian.
Seems this community is attracting the downvoting cockroaches.
US trying hard to not repeat the Killdozer
Oh all right. Sorry, too many liberal idiots running amuck in the comments. Got carried away.
I mean, fascists view anti-fascism as bad.
And the way the media twisted antifa in the US to equate them with Trump supporters, now most Americans view it as such too.
I haven’t changed my opinion of Musk, but I do believe people should be applauded when doing the right thing. At the very least, perhaps they’ll like being applauded for entirely selfish reasons, and then do the right thing again.
A) it is when you ignore every single point except the one you can twist
B) and you were wrong
C) yet you’ve been minimizing the Ukrainian coup orchestrated by the US, and denying the right of self-determination to people in the Donbass
D) you didn’t use it as a negative at all. Nowhere in your comment do you condemn the Iraq war. In fact you are whitewashing it by implying that somehow the US should be praised for not doing ethnic cleansing (which they did, lest we forget the 1.5 million dead Iraqi)
Oh they haven’t? India-Pakistan conflict did not happen then. The Cuban missile crisis didn’t happen either. I guess the US hasn’t been trying to kill Iran’s nuclear program with drone bombings and assassinations either.
I’d say open a book, but I don’t think you have the capacity to benefit from it.
Are you pretending that Ukraine did not apply for NATO membership, or that NATO stated they were planning to place nukes there (which we only learned because Ukraine was cheering it on Twitter)?
It’s Boris and Natasha from the Rocky Bullwinkle show. That’s all it is to these idiots.
Yet you are willing to support the actual fascists who were bombing their own people, in the most corrupt country in Europe. I wouldn’t expect an Andrews Air Base resident to understand.
For context, Musk denied a request by Ukraine ro extend Starlink to Sevastopol, so they would bomb with accuracy the Russian fleet in their docks.
He said this publicly and added that that would make SpaceX complicit in massive escalation to war.
Thank you for proving to be a jingoist wilful varlet.
Announcing this now though, is an indication of intentions. And the intentions are probably to raise trade with DPRK as a first stage. There’s also a possibility that DPRK might attempt to join BRICS for trading.