But GrapheneOS is unrooteable by design…

Create multiple branches that only differ in cases from a Unix OS so it breaks git for Windows users in the same project.

Yes, but that would be a lot less efficient. With a dielectric mirror you can get easily 99.9% of the maximum momentum gain from the light, while with a solar powered laser you would get for the emission the compounded efficiency of the solar panel + storage + laser, so way below 10%. So you would gain around 10 times more impulse from your solar panel absorbing light than from the actual laser.

The final momentum gain is a bit different as the maximum you can gain from a photon is double its momentum (because you can reflect it back with opposite direction).

Nowadays people use radical in political terms as another word for extremist, but it used to mean going to the root causes. Equality and justice, or the lack of, are the root of many political issues. So you are radical in a way, but that is good.

He didn’t even have a noble goal, that was the excuse. All he did was because he wanted to.

National power grid sabotage

Wow, that first one is so cool.

Yeah, I misremembered the Interstellar paper that said it was the first simulation for a movie and thought it was the first image simulation ever. It’s even referencing the old one there.

The second one. The image is simulated as how an external observer would see it. It was firstly done for the Interstellar movie.

Israel finds Hamas members in local nonprofit

Toby Fox cooking a fire soundtrack and then making a game to have something to put it into

Also the 2D gaussian integral is used to give an insight on why the 1D gaussian integral is sqrt of pi. Here is a video with cool visualization for anyone interested.

That should be an approximation. To get exactly pi the range of both integrals should be from minus infinity to infinity like this. It’s the integral of the 2D Gaussian, which is fairly known.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe

From which less than 1% is electrified and don’t even mention high speed networks

Enlightened centrist

It doesn’t mean that every person has equal ability to physically defend themselves, but that society has the mechanisms to defend everyone that is being attacked. A grandma doesn’t need to be able to self defend against a thug in the street if the people nearby do it for her.

The second paragraph is not relevant as there are no historical examples of a dictator getting into power from within an anarchist society.

That’s true for all types of society. But it also means that a completely anarchist society is more stable than the rest because the means of self defence are equally distributed and that everyone would rise against such authoritarian attack.

You support war crimes?

Also I feel like the bare metal ones would collect a bunch of mud inside filtering through the gaps and affecting the balance.

Here the more pragmatic use of truth is being used, which most of the people would agree in its objectiveness. Either the real person did the call or not.

Even in the philosophical concept of truth different schools of thoughts have different views on its objectiveness. Here is a better resource I think.