100% agreed, though I’m in the “neither is ideal” camp. My favorite language, by a long way at this point is Rust.
It’s not functional, but borrows a lot of functional idioms while avoiding the pain points functional language usually hit in exchange for losing the purity of functional languages.
It doesn’t even have to be only for known devices. Once you’ve compromised one device, you can just phone home to have a full powered LLM do your work.
The only real use cases for this would be on closed networks with no internet access, or networks where the traffic is closely monitored. Like, yeah, if I’m trying to hack the CIA, maybe I consider something like this. For the vast majority of devices and networks, this is inefficient and unnecessary.
I mean, it is kind of cool. But vanishingly few organizations have tight enough security that this is worth doing.
I really like the infographic, but given the amount of disinformation out there, some sort of source is really needed here or I have no idea if I should trust this.
I mean, it’s probably not Russian propaganda with these numbers, which does improve confidence a bunch. But still - it’s bad information hygiene. We should have a norm of not trusting unsourced data. If our side doesn’t care about sources, it makes it easier for the Russians to ignore them too.
“Serious”.
Looking through the comment history there’s no attempt to justify positions, just repeating talking points. I doubt this is even a person.