• 21 Posts
  • 394 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle






  • As I said at the outset: I’m sympathetic to the cause. I have grave concerns about the planet and how as a species, we are causing immeasurable damage with our reckless treatment of resources. Nobody is defending the company nor denying she has a worthy goal at heart.

    But all of that is beside the point. The point is her central premise is deeply flawed: she is simply not on trial for protesting Woodside.




  • Oh, you haven’t dissuaded me from watching it. I’ll get there. John Wick is something I need to watch while running on the treadmill, to discharge testosterone or something. I can’t watch that sort of movie from bed.

    I’ve been on the treadmill this week. I finally saw the two Kingsman movies. They’re hysterical. Laughably violent but not serious like John Wick. More like what a 70’s Bond movie might be like if it were made today.





  • She herself raised the issue of the art gallery and complained she was being called a vandal. I was saying that yes: she literally vandalised a piece of art. She’s a vandal by definition.

    As to the raid itself, it’s clearly in response to the attack on the Woodside CEOs private residence. Showing up at someone’s home, inviting the media to film you as you allegedly damage the house, scare a family inside at 6:30 in the morning and attempt to lock yourself to the house are acts that take you into unlawful territory if found guilty. That’s what she is on trial for.

    Nobody had a problem when they were standing out the front of the Woodside building holding signs. That’s peaceful protest.






  • This news does not bring me happiness. I’ve just finished the second one again, and I remember really liking the third, but don’t know whether it’ll hold up as well as the first film has.

    I can’t understand why he made that choice at the end of the second film. It makes zero sense.

    The premise was great. The world building was great. The currency makes zero sense. The violence is so silly that it’s fun.

    I am building toward watching the fourth for the first time.


  • I’m sympathetic to her cause, but I’m not surprised that her methods have landed her in trouble with the law. Her idea of “peaceful protest” is a bit skewed. She’s trying to maximize exposure, but she’s crossing lines into unlawful territory to do so. You can’t just break the law and say it’s to ‘save the planet’ and then do a surprised Pikachu when the police get involved.

    If I go into the art gallery and spray paint a piece of art, I’m going to be called a vandal. It’s not going to matter why I did this thing. If I go online and start to coordinate threatening someone at home and damaging their property, I’m going to get on the radar of law enforcement. Again, my motives are not going to matter.

    She’s not going on trial for protesting Woodside. She’s going on trial, because she is accused of breaking the law.