deleted by creator

I always thought panache was more of something you could add to yourself like a fancy coat.

Like a feather boa would give someone panache but maybe charisma would be the ability to attract with a smile. I know nothing, just guessing.

deleted by creator

That’ll be 3 Lira

Ya beat me by seconds. Lemmy is truly blooming lol

A trumpet properly played cuts directly to that bittersweet, blue part of my soul.

I bought Rimworld in 2015 on a Steam Christmas Sale and I finally played it this last year.

Breaking news: it’s really fun lol

Soooo Spider-Man won every major category? Great lol

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Things I learned today. I thought it was Saudi Arabia and had to look it up.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_production

RE4 was my first dive into the series a million years ago and I can’t wait to do this in VR. Picked up a bunch of PSVR2 titles when it first dropped but that has trickled out and I’m excited to have another quality game.

Mine is working now but I’m with ya, it’s absolute garbage that Sony hasn’t said anything. I have tons of content connected to my account that has been going strong for over a decade. I get the inherent risks that come with buying digital content but this crazy.

Really great video on the bikes!

deleted by creator

I was not excited for this show until seeing that trailer! Fingers crossed 🤞

Invincible Ignorance Fallacy maybe?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy

The invincible ignorance fallacy,[1] also known as argument by pigheadedness,[2] is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word. The method used in this fallacy is either to make assertions with no consideration of objections or to simply dismiss objections by calling them excuses, conjecture, etc. or saying that they are proof of nothing, all without actually demonstrating how the objection fit these terms. It is similar to the ad lapidem fallacy, in which the person rejects all the evidence and logic presented, without providing any evidence or logic that could lead to a different conclusion.

Red-herring refers to a deliberately misleading clue. Gish gallop might be closer, it’s when you make a bunch of claims at once to overwhelm your opponent without regard to the validity of the claims. It’s not quite willful ignorance either. Hmmm…

I love pedantic stuff like this so I’m pretty sure I will be thinking about this the rest of the day now… thanks lol

deleted by creator