I generally agree, but those terms you prefer are specific about the type of media. I think “creator” and “content” are still the most neutral and catch-all terms, but they have been tarnished by commercialized platforms.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: July 9th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I usually avoid corporate stuff, but not always. What term do you prefer over “creator”?
I think the next tier would be to only pirate media that is licensed by huge corporations and still buy indie media to support creators
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ukraine@sopuli.xyz•Kazakhstan's Tokayev tells Putin it is time to "freeze" Russia's war against Ukraine
1·3 days agodeleted by creator
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ukraine@sopuli.xyz•Video of the Russian Rosatom ship Yanina sinking in the Black Sea near Novorossiysk.
14·8 days agoIn my head I hear the shittyflute edition of “My Heart Will Go On”
Have I ever implied that nothing should be done? Of course we need to fight for change. I simply doubt that axing the entire organization is a good solution. That would be like fighting your potential ally.
it must fall
That seems very radical. Why entirely abolish an organization that generally fights for the greater good, just because it failed once or a few times? What is going to take its place?
Next: Grant Malone (“grant my loan”)



I get your point, but what would be an alternative term for content or creators in general? One that encompasses all types of media. Maybe “artists” and “art”, but that doesn’t always fit, I guess