It’s not actually law and that’s just what companies want to be the belief for them behaving reprehensibly
Garnish2087
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined vor 5 Monaten
Cake day: 25. Februar 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Garnish2087@fedinsfw.appto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Chinese EVs arrive on Canadian soil as federal memo warns of privacy risks (archive.org link)English
20·vor 2 MonatenGee sure would be nice if it weren’t against the law to properly look into the software and reverse engineer it so that couldn’t be a problem

Yes, I believe you’re interpreting that page incorrectly. Fiduciary duties are law bindings for specific relationships and situations not applicable for all publicly traded companies to all shareholders.
I believe you’re confusing that idea with the theory of shareholder supremacy that’s a claim, popularized by the likes of Jack Welch to support their actions.
The background comes from Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. in 1919 which stated
and the interpretation has been quite debated.