This paper basically debunks everything she said in her shitty video since productivity mostly equals technological advancement, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169
This paper basically debunks everything she said in her shitty video since productivity mostly equals technological advancement, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169
You can always just say it is a study of revolutionary artistic style. The thing to be concerned about is mixing your real world pieces, that you would put in a portfolio, and the ones you publish under a pseudonym.
I think the AI is going out on a limb a bit. The features in the output are just a bit off, it doesn’t look like him anymore. Noseridge, eye spacing, hairline, cheekbone pronounciation, eyebrow spacing, mouthprofile, it’s kind of interesting how the normalized output reshapes the original.
In Sweden it is cast as a Russian/Wagner takeover snce we’re unable to comprehend anything outside of an colonial framework, instead of a struggle for self determination. That being said any counter narrative is portrayed as pro Russian propaganda being spread on pro Russian social media. Nothing is said about the French colonial bullshit, the unfair and exremely exploitative extraction of natural reaources, or even any attempt to correctly historically contextualize the “coup”.
Hello! I don’t understand how emojis work so you get an old school <3 and o7
Dont worry about me comrade, I have been active in the real world since the 90s
Communism will win!
Next stop, Bob Igers villa
Donteskt children are being bombed by NATO, see the bomb behind the girl, the text on it reads NATO. Also the girl’s face and eyecolor is that of the Donetsk republic. Also Maruipol was one of the strongholds for nazism, as in not just an Azov HQ but also had a diaspora of WW2 nazis, which to my understanding had settled there.