This is literally what a lot of the boomers were forced to learn to do. Lefties became ambidextrous or got called the devil in a not fun way.

Funnily enough that’s what the Nazis said

In hindsight, perhaps CADmonkey had some other clues in his life.

Back in MY DAY DOUBLE STACKS WERE ONE DOLLAR UPHILL BOTH WAYS IN THE SNOW

He doesn’t have a relationship.

Fascists always think terror against civilians will lead to their victory no matter how many times history proves them wrong.

Because it could be a step towards polygamy, which increases the number of partners involved in a divorce. Imagine a scenario where one divorce triggers a separate filing, or a prenup being rendered invalid by the second partner becoming the sole partner, etc etc.

I think divorce aka family lawyers already kind of handle these things as is in the case of merged assets.

The revolution will not be litigated.

I think this actually does a better job than most explanations of why this is a practical excercise.

Consent didn’t really enter the picture in a lot of the stories.

A little green, he’s got a UTI.

It’s like they’re actually a monarchy or something.

It’s like all humans are the same and will do terrible things when their culture combines both supremacist and victimization rhetoric.

She was trying to imitate Steve Jobs, not really a “tough guy” voice.

That’s because it’s all just waves anyways.

Yeah it’s sarcasm

I can’t wait for the ensuing moral panic that will just increase sales.

That’s their business

The lone juror was the guilty vote, and the “innocent” verdict in this case is “meaning she will go to the prison with grippy socks instead” which also isn’t nullification so you just didn’t know anything at all.

Just to be clear for any idiots in the room, and there’s a lot in this particular room:

Yes, jurors have to follow the law. You will be instructed on what it is for your region.

What they can’t do is prove your decision was against the law unless you’re stupid enough to admit it.