I’m not property of the government, why should the government suspend my rights to “protect” me from myself?
I’m not property of the government, why should the government suspend my rights to “protect” me from myself?
Lmao not my fault you deserved it 🤷
Because the app I use lets me see what they said through removal, and I found it extremely funny that the guy is apparently banned from the home depot website or something
Sorry, I misread your earlier comment as you saying she supported ending those programs. As such, I retract my acknowledgement that she’s right about anything, and return to my original stance of full condemnation.
Genuinely, how does this guy constantly spam this brazenly uncivil and dishonest crap, and you guys never do anything about him, but you throw bans at conservatives at the drop of a hat?
Fucking as if. Her type will always find new shit to cry about. Just because she accidentally stumbled into a good idea once it doesn’t mean she deserves respect
She’s free to say whatever she likes, and the university is free to keep slime like her on. And similarly, I’m free to judge them based on their own speech.
If I went and used my position as a federal employee to sling this type of political shit, I’d be out a job. It’s not exactly like the university is in the dark about what this teacher is doing.
So it should just be ignored that leftists are using universities to push their garbage?
To be fair, though, I’m not sure why media generally insists on presenting academic viewpoints like this
Because they are fundamentally social topics that impact your average Joe. To just let a bunch of quacks leverage institutions to push their crap is how we let things go worse.
Threatening to hijack a plane?
Good. All gun control should be abolished.
A large amount of the community here came over from the shitshow that was the .world community where the admins were a bunch of reddit admins wannabes who just banned people for not being leftist, and at that time, the sh.itjust.works community was entirely umoderated, which caused all the activity to dry up because nobody liked dealing with the perpetual trolls that just harassed everyone there.
We’ll start at the beginning: So, there are absolutely no circumstances when the government can do anything to promote the public’s interest in health and safety through factual information? None at all? Zero?
As I said, the government is free to push its own narrative through its own channels. If some government organization wants to spend their time spamming tweets, they’re free to do so. They can use their own websites, call for press conferences, that type of stuff.
You’re talking about the content of what the government is asking. I’m asking about the act of asking itself, as was Justice Jackson
Yes. The act of asking is itself the problem. Justices should not be asking questions of whether or not we should discard the constitution just because it makes her political masters have a hard time enacting their garbage.
Like I give a fuck. The purpose of government isn’t to make people happy, it’s to uphold their rights.
Everybody fucking knows he’s just an obnoxious troll.