deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I have an 8. Also owned a 7 (but I do lots of hiking and broke the glass on the 7, so couldn’t trust the waterproofing anymore, so upgraded).

Why would I give up on their hardware though?

I left Spotify because of Joe Rogan.

Figured they don’t have money to pay artists well, but they have millions for a guy I don’t care about.

I’m not a fan of Apple, but they seem to pay artists better and also seem to give 2 fs about Joe Rogan.

I don’t have Netflix either anymore. Apparently I’m not missing much

You already announced you use Arch… So you’re doing good

If you’re not a bot… say biscuit

What did you call?

You didn’t post any reference backing up your claim and now you’re giving yourself a pat on the back without actually doing anything. Where have I seen that behaviour before? Hmmm

I needed to google your quote. And I could only find 1 reference… and it didn’t actually have any real references. You made the claim, let’s see the reference

The only thing you did was post an opinion in an annoying font. WATCH ME USE ALL CAPS. TALKING IN ALL CAPS MAKES WHAT I’M SAYING ALL TRUE!!!

I thought I’m on lemmy, but apparently, it feels like I’m on Reddit or Facebook

You copied that from https://www.thedailybeast.com/kamala-harris-ag-office-tried-to-keep-inmates-locked-up-for-cheap-labor

And from what I see, they seem to the only ones saying that it has anything to do with cheap Labor. If you can find a real source though that includes court transcripts, I’ll believe it

Secondly, non violent offenders could include criminals like Trump and other tax fraud people. Ie. The people who regularly get a free pass. Non violent does not mean innocent. It also includes people who scammed elderly people as an example

What kind of message does that send letting a lot of them loose simply because they are short spaced? They should earn porole

It’s entirely reasonable for anyone who cares about the law would fight to enforce sentencing. In fact, lawyers regularly defend people they don’t believe are innocent (but the law is the law, and everyone deserves the right to a proper defence)

Also, posting stuff like this in large font is just annoying. It doesn’t make it credible, it just makes it bigger

Is that the current right wing attack plan?

You guys are really scraping the barrel these days. I guess calling her corporate is the only thing you have remaining.

She used to be a prosecutor. There’s never been any evidence she accepted bribes (she’s not Clarence Thomas)

(deleted - moved instance)

(deleted - moved instance)

I feel like this is completely avoidable bloat.

You could quite easily create this bloat in any language

(deleted - moved instance)

(deleted - moved instance)

Yep…

The fact is, we see smokers continually ignore the laws. Now, we’re encouraging more people to smoke… Why? Why make it so accessible? There is no reason.

At the very least, only allow it being sold as edibles, so the rest of us aren’t exposed.

There’s also the question of addicted people. I had 2 housemates with an addiction issue to weed (1 only just finished rehab, as well as her family). Making weed more readily accessible won’t help these people.

Seems like you can press the not now button

Not a big deal…

deleted by creator

(deleted - moved instance)