I’m sorry sir, we stopped serving breakfast at 11 30

🎵

And I see your true colors

Shining through

I see your true colors

And that’s why I block you

🎵

Maybe there’s a good argument for nonviolence but “the means dictate the ends” isn’t it imo. It could be that there’s more to it in the book but presented as is I’d say it doesn’t follow logically, I’m going to want to see proof that it’s actually true which is going to be tricky because there are obvious counter examples.

The easiest one is probably Ukraine. I’m sure most Ukrainians want to live in a peaceful and nonviolent society, but if they took your principle to heart there would be no Ukraine right now.

Nonono you’re not supposed to have principles, you’re supposed to just pick sides instead otherwise ‘what about USA’ won’t work as a gotcha. Just think of the poor tankies, whatabout USA is all they have, would you really tankie that away from them?

We’re a family here! You know, one of those toxic shitty kinds of families where the obligations only go one way and we all just pretend that’s cool, 'cause we’re a family!

They are often found residing on or near couches though

Of course they do. That’s what happens when you invade someone, the someone you invade also hits back at you.

In Australia government funding is distributed to political parties based on the number of first preference votes they get as well so even if your first choice doesn’t get in, you still helped them by putting them first.

Not only that but I thought comedy was explicitly ok as well! It’s so confusing, you have to ban so many accounts before you get free speech apparently.

That’s not that good, I can do that on a good day if I’m really hungry.

You’re a bit of a cunt aren’t you

What qualifies someone to be a judge is simply redefined to be what is popular. A judge should therefore no longer follow the law, but make the ruling most in line with what is popular. Under a voting system that is the sole qualifier.

Saddam has some incredible crush resistance, we should start making entire submarines out of whatever material that is.

I see…but wouldn’t that cost rich people more than zero dollars?

Yes I agree, and just because there is a methodology doesn’t make the result not arbitrary. Can you explain what number four means? How do I assess it, what’s a 0, what’s a 5 and what’s a 10? How does number 2 relate to bias, isn’t that a factuality rating thing , why is it in the bias rubric? It’s a joke, each rating is totally arbitrary as there is no definition of what each one means beyond some vague description of the category. It’s essentially pick a number, feels based.

I have worked with qualitive rubrics before and this one is barely worthy of the name honestly. Two people could take this rubric away and come to completely opposite conclusions based on their own biases.

Hide ya cats, hide ya dogs…hide ya gerbils, ‘cause they eatin’ everybody out here

He wants a perfect body. He wants a perfect soul.

That’s pretty metal

I seem to remember one of the GTA games (maybe San Andreas?) had a stand up set from I think Ricky Gervais as something that would play on the TVs.

Biden: killing Americans in the west bank is totally unacceptable…but we will accept it.