Fox

It’s basically a two for one unpopular opinion.

Problem is lumping in his problems with other mental health problems that are nothing like his, worsening the stigma.

Sure, you can be happy that they donated money to a cause. But billionaires are the reason donations and philanthropy are necessary in the first place. You don’t become a billionaire unless you’re doing unethical shit and/or exploiting a lot of people (there’s inheritance, but that’s another problematic topic altogether).

My point is don’t hate the player, hate the game.

Some players have enough wealth to make the rules of the game. So I have to disagree.

(who’s background is developing gambling games)

Sure, he worked in the sector, but that’s because he couldn’t find better jobs. What you’re implying here is really unfair, especially considering there aren’t even any microtransactions in the game. As far as I know, he just made a game that he felt was fun.

Who shit in your coffee to make you so hateful? Holy shit.

This hurts so much because it’s my life :(

Okay, let me specify: You said “Meta isn’t even thinking about the fediverse at this point […]” which is demonstrably false. They reached out, so they’re thinking about it.

If that was the case they wouldn’t have reached out to Mastodon instance owners a while ago before the launch.

A big chunk of techies are furries. And oh boy do they commission a lot of art.

It’s not about any business model. It’s about killing competition. https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Ironically, had the titanic hit the iceberg straight on it probably would have survived. Swerving at the very last moment was what made it sink.