• metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      exactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        Technically NewPipe simply parses the website and is seen as a web browser from YouTube’s point of view.

        That how they bypass the API’s TOS, they don’t use it.

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Trivial? What information does this whitelist hold that can’t be spoofed? It’s not like apps have to tell the truth about what they are.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          People do that? Just have their code go on the internet and tell lies?! This is a Christian internet!

          (yes it’s /s)

        • passepartout@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          This is what current implementations like Revanced do. The endgame will be fullblown DRM. Until then, it will be a cat and mouse game.