• swordsmanluke@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just saying.

    … Saying what, exactly?

    I said that we should

    • design for change
    • “within reason”
    • because we can’t know what exact changes are needed.

    And you argued… The same thing? Just in the reverse order?

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Seems like he’s worried you’ll Java everything up, which can be valid.

      I think a good, easy example is whether your application should allow a selection of databases or be tied to one database.

      You can make arguments for either, often (but not always) regardless of your use case.