• Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I appreciate that Riot at least took the time to consider supporting Linux and explaining the situation to the community. Unfortunate that I won’t be able to play League of Legends anymore but I guess there’s not that much momentum behind a community of only ~800 daily users. Looking forward to switching to DotA.

    • reev@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      They claim “we have never officially supported Linux” and then took a random day to point at how few people went through the effort of making it work anyway as their reason to not support it.

      • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        A random day months after announcing they would break it on Linux. I think the numbers before the Vanguard announcement would be far more representative.

    • CluelessDude@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sort of unfair when weirdly enough MacOS is ok tho, they didn’t consider anything, simply decided not to.

  • NotPersonal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m actually grateful for this. Vanguard was exactly what I needed to stop playing the game. I had an unhealthy relationship with it and this actually helped me.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          just as toxic, frustrating and timewasting. i quit it for the same reasons people say they quit lol. i did play lol for a short while and found it to be that bad too.

  • blackfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Too many distros so they can’t fully secure it. And if they did target just one distro the blowback would be intolerable as always. Currently only 800 players through lutris so its just not worth the investment. I get their reasoning it just sucks

    • winety@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      And if they did target just one distro the blowback would be intolerable as always.

      Would it be? Steam officially only supported (maybe still does) Ubuntu for a long time and I’ve never seen much blowback.

      • blackfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        There was quite a lot when it came out, it died out after a while. There is far less for the steamos now based on arch but I think thats because its just on the steamdeck and they haven’t prevented other distros from being ported to the hardware

    • CluelessDude@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I feel that the 800 players count is severely misleading counting, they’ve announced no Linux support and vanguard changes for months now most people already stopped playing LoL on linux, this 800 number is counting now not a accumulative number.

  • Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Basically they pulled skewed and cherry picked metrics showing extremely low Linux activity to justify locking those players out of playing their game. It’s scummy and their “trust me bro” attitude towards vanguard should be concerning more than anything.

    What I took away from this article was that there’s a shit load of cheaters in LoL, 15% of ranked matches or something like that had cheaters or smurfs. 1 in 10 games in NA and 1 in 5 matches in Europe is just insane.