• Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I propose that we treat AI as ancillas, companions, muses, or partners in creation and understanding our place in the cosmos.

    While there are pitfalls in treating the current generation of LLMs and GANs as sentient, or any AI for that matter, there will be one day where we must admit that an artificial intelligence is self-aware and sentient, practically speaking.

    To me, the fundamental question about AI, that will reveal much about humanity, is philosophical as much as it is technical: if a being that is artificially created, has intelligence, and is functionally self-aware and sentient, does it have natural rights?

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It would have natural rights, yes. Watch Star Trek TNG’s “The Measure of a Man” which tackles this issue exactly. Does the AI of current days have intelligence or sentience? I don’t believe so. We’re a FAR cry away from Lt. Cmdr. Data.

      • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        We’re a FAR cry away from Lt. Cmdr. Data.

        Yes, I agree. I make deep neural network models for a living. The best of the best LLM models still “hallucinate” unreliably after 30-40 queries. My expertise is in computer vision systems; perhaps that’s been mitigated better as of late.

        My point was to emphasize the necessity for us, as a species, to answer the philosophical question and start codifying legal jurisprudence around it well before the moment of self-awareness of a General-Purpose AI.