• Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    They don’t generally have the funding to have multiple games in the pipeline, so that each resource is busy at all times.

    It’s a shitty deal for the staff and they should contract more or something instead.

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If they can’t afford to keep the employees on bench for a month till they start another one then that sounds like terrible management.

      • Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        This would be my gut reaction as well. I’ve met some game developers privately and got to know them better and after that a career in game development was out of the question for me. It’s not even the fault of the game studios, many of which are being lead by idealistic game devs themselves. It’s the publishers who only offer contracts that are so tightly knit, that many game studios go bankrupt after release if they can’t get another contract quick enough. The whole industry is rotten and no amount of management will save that on the lowest level of the food chain. It felt too me that only idealistic devs with a high frustration tolerance go into game development and that is being exploited to the extreme.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I understand they have different types of staff with different areas of expertise, and they might be dependent on another thing being done first, like models before textures, but laying them off completely and bringing them back or hiring green employees does not seem like an efficient solution.