• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, I’d like games to be available, but I don’t see archive.org’s legal basis for providing it. I mean, the stuff is copyrighted. Lack of commercial availability doesn’t change that.

    Yeah, some abandonware sites might try to just fly under the radar, and some rightsholders might just not care, might not be much value there. But once you’re in a situation where a publisher is fighting a legal battle with you, you’re clearly not trying that route.

    You can argue that copyright law should be revised. Maybe copyright on video games should be shorter or something. Maybe there should be some provision that if a product isn’t offered for sale for longer than a certain period of time, copyright goes away. But I don’t think that this is the route to get that done.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Legal doesnt mean correct. Slavery used to be legal.

      Copyright is a broken system that gives giant corporations the power to hold art ransom. There is no argument that holds up against art being preserved.

      So no, copyright might have had use in the past but by now it is morally sound to pirate.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If thats the case they pushed a lot of pro IP sentiment with it.

          It’s cruel that companies are even able to do shit like this and we should destroy them for it.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t see anything pro IP in their comment. They just stated the reality of the situation.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Maybe copyright on video games should be shorter or something. Maybe there should be some provision that if a product isn’t offered for sale for longer than a certain period of time, copyright goes away. But I don’t think that this is the route to get that done.

              This person is playing devils advocate imo. Either they are very interested in law and facts and not much in justice or they‘re low level trolling. I cant say and I dont want to accuse them so I‘ll go with the former.

              It is completely obvious imo that the IP scam is going rampant and companies are finding new ways to abuse customers every day, although the governments worldwide are pushing back (finally).

              Still, stating it like this shows they could not care less and the lack of compassion with people who feel strongly about freedom and equality rubs me the wrong way.

              Does this male more sense to you?

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lack of commercial availability doesn’t change that.

      But is there any reason why it doesn’t?