• NeedingvsGetting@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve tried digital books, but I’ve found that physical books work much better for my brain. I retain more information and can “get lost” in the story, whereas, for some inexplicable reason, digital books being read on a screen kind of “flatten” a story for me. It’s almost like a 3d vs 2d experience for me.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Have you ever used an eink reader, or just a tablet or something? The difference is night and day for me. The first time I used an eink reader I thought there was paper covering the screen at first.

      • NeedingvsGetting@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have! But unfortunately, I had the same result as if it were my phone/tablet. I really wish I understood why it was like this for me so I could maybe work on it, but I guess I’m just one of those “need-to-physically-turn-the-page” people :/

    • june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      No this totally makes sense to me.

      It doesn’t impact my experience of the story, but there is something to having the next page hidden behind the turn and knowing that it’s right there. When I read an ebook it’s like reading an article. The sensation is different and it loses a touch of excitement without that tactile feeling of ‘the next page’. Pages don’t matter in ebooks either. You adjust the text size and the ‘page’ count is suddenly radically different. I measure my progress in chapters or percentages now.

      It makes sense to me why that wouldn’t work for some folks.