• A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can we also address that they wrote “is” instead of “are”, implying they originally wrote “it” and then erased it?

      • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I was high af when I wrote that, I honestly have no clue how I came to that conclusion lol

        Edit: actually I think what I was thinking was it doesn’t work with “they”

        • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          It doesn’t but at this point it should.

          It’s weird and confusing to pluralize a sentence when you’re still talking about a singular individual. We should normalize “Why is they so cute?” If we refuse to make a new non-demeaning word for a singular.

          I say non-demeaning because “Why is it so cute?” Is correct, but calling a living being “it” is objectifying.

          • randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I used to think that too, until I realized that verb conjugation in English is not decided by whether the subject is singular or plural. “You” can be both singular or plural, yet we always say “you are” and never “you is”. Same for the pronoun “they”. It’s always “they are”.

            Unless you is also willing to normalize “you is”, I think “they are” is good enough.