• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Israel has other options for aid and weapons

    Not in the short term they don’t. You don’t just switch from US standards at the drop of a hat and think everything is good. That’s why the West was initially trying to scrounge up old Soviet equipment for Ukraine. They’d have to retrofit or junk a lot of their current hardware and retrain their army on the new stuff. And that includes the Iron Dome keeping them safe-ish from rocket fire.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yet Ukraine has been successfully armed by the west, so it’s clearly manageable. The scale between Ukraine and Israel/Gaza is also a huge difference.

      The one thing that Russia couldn’t replace would be the iron dome. I’ll agree that’s no small thing.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Two years in they have. That’s a better timescale for Gaza than “next month”. And scale is irrelevant to the problems for the armed nation. They have fewer weapons, but also fewer resources. The problem with arming Ukraine was never that the West needed time to find enough weapons, it was integrating weapons with their armed forces.