Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoYou aren't arch user if you dislike read documentationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1699arrow-down132
arrow-up1667arrow-down1imageYou aren't arch user if you dislike read documentationlemmy.worldWaffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squareGrass@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up43·8 months agoThe arch wiki is generally actually good though. Dumbed down where it needs to be, usable examples, and in a familiar format.
minus-squareVilian@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-28 months agoexactly, i use fedora, and their documentation is good, but archwiki is just faster
minus-squaregentooer@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoIt’s great. As a Gentoo user I still use it quite often. It helps that Arch has a far larger userbase, so its wiki is a lot bigger. (It also helps the Arch wiki didn’t lose everything 15-ish years ago due to a server hard drive failure)
minus-squareVinnyDaCat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoThanks, I was confused for a second, and was wondering if something had happened to make the arch wiki unusable or if it had been replaced.
The arch wiki is generally actually good though. Dumbed down where it needs to be, usable examples, and in a familiar format.
exactly, i use fedora, and their documentation is good, but archwiki is just faster
It’s great. As a Gentoo user I still use it quite often. It helps that Arch has a far larger userbase, so its wiki is a lot bigger. (It also helps the Arch wiki didn’t lose everything 15-ish years ago due to a server hard drive failure)
Thanks, I was confused for a second, and was wondering if something had happened to make the arch wiki unusable or if it had been replaced.