• smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They could just use AGPL. Amazon would need to contribute back, but with no restrictions on who and how can run it. Current licence has a clause that prevents any providing of the software on the network.

    • yildolw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Does that prevent my managed Mastodon instance host from providing Redis over the network to my Mastodon, or does that count as them providing Redis to themselves and then providing Mastodon to me?

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        The wording says “third-parties as a service”, so as long as Redis isn’t accessible by people outside your organization, it’s fine. But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

        • rbits@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

          Where does it say this? I can’t see that in the SSPL

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s in the RSALv2:

            You may not make the functionality of the Software or a Modified version available to third parties as a service

            • rbits@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Ah right. You could do a paid Redis service if you use the SSPL license though, right?

              • xthexder@l.sw0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                That does seem to be the case. As long as any modifications to the source are publicly available. Which is pretty reasonable.