smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1830arrow-down110cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1820arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square147fedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
minus-squarephillaholic@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down19·9 months agoDRM is mandatory in any spec you expect content owners to support. We don’t have to like it, but it’s absolutely not going away.
minus-squareContend6248@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·edit-29 months agoThere are couple of ways, not buying the content for example. DRM is for paying customers.
minus-squarephillaholic@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·9 months agoThat’s 99% of the reason we use HDMI…
minus-squaresmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.deOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 months agoWell said, content owners, not creators.
DRM is mandatory in any spec you expect content owners to support. We don’t have to like it, but it’s absolutely not going away.
There are couple of ways, not buying the content for example. DRM is for paying customers.
That’s 99% of the reason we use HDMI…
Who is we?
Well said, content owners, not creators.