• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Be civil.

    The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            8 months ago

            He is dead. So you think his zombie corpse has a vested interest in restricting our rights?

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m not opposed to every restriction. I’m just opposed to most restrictions. The bump stock isn’t even about the 2nd. It’s about can the atf change the meanings of words. While I don’t mind the ban. The logic is bad and that’s why the ban should be overturned. It does not create a machine gun. It does not meet the requirements of the law.