• poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like you are testing the Reddit scraper bot already? Maybe make a new account for it and mark it as a bot so that people can hide it if they want.

    • jimmyjoners@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll never understand the antibot sentiment. Reddit was filled with bots reposting stuff all the time too. Who cares? Let the votes decide if it’s good or not

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It can drown out contributions and questions from actual humans using the site. So while you can also have a useful discussion on a bot posted thread, ultimately someone has to create original content somewhere and people get discouraged if their original posts are lost in a flood of bot posts.

        • x_cell@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree. I come here to interact with people online and read interesting discussions, not merely see content.

        • jimmyjoners@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a link aggregation site though. Like the memes and stuff might be OC, but news articles and the like make total sense to be posted by bots IMO. The comments and engagement is what I’m here for. The more posts that trigger and allow for that engagement the better

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That is a bit contradictory. I think Lemmy is more like a forum. The OPs links are helpful to initiate engagement but if it is all superficial stuff pulled from external places by bots and not actual members posting their own ideas, the following discussion will also be very shallow.

      • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        One consideration is who controls the bot and decides what information it spreads.

        A corporation or government agency could use bots to have significant influence over decentralized social media

        • jimmyjoners@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For sure. But isn’t that what votes are for? As long as it’s not from obviously problematic sources I’m still not seeing a big issue here either.

          • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bots can post advertisements, disinformation etc. More likely their message will spread if they keep exposing people to it. And yeah, bot accounts can also vote