President Biden vowed on Monday to veto a House Republican bill that would provide $17.6 billion in aid to Israel, calling it a “cynical political maneuver” intended to hurt the chances of passage for broader legislation that would provide money for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. border.

House Republicans fiercely oppose the larger bill, which was unveiled by a small, bipartisan group of senators over the weekend. It calls for $118.3 billion in spending and would overhaul some of the nation’s immigration laws to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border.

Archive

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yeah, migrants just love to surge come election time.

    What a bullshit.

      • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ll never forget for months them screeching about it, and literally a day after the mid-term elections were over, the “caravans” were literally never mentioned again; until the next election year that is…

      • David_Eight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        According to these statistics, the same thing happens every year. If you look at the previous years they all start to go up in January then peak around May and start to decline after that. So what’s the big deal if this happens every year? It’s to be expected.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          The conservatives have been trotting out the “southern border crisis” red herring for so long that The Democrats were the first party to do it in the US. They keep doing it because it works. Those of us that live next to the border, like I do, can tell everyone back east that there’s no problem, but if one racist asshole starts yelling, there’s a whole bunch of racist assholes that live 2000 miles away that get scared and riled up.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            what conservatives are upset about is often legal migrants and sometimes tourists. Its more transparent when cons talk about black people as “black culture”. They say its the “illegals” they’re worried about, but I doubt any rich republican employs less than 6 “Illegals” because I haven’t met a rich person that paid a fair wage. Its always been unserious.

          • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The real problem is your deranged government officials bussing them all over the god damn US. Not that we can control your idiots but our idiots need to respond in kind. That is recieving them. Providing humane care and shelter. Then funding legal representation to sue the shit out of the people who sent them there.

            Using human lives as a political hot potato is fucking despicable.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              I live in California. Our government is receiving busses from everywhere.

              I agree that Greg Abbot should be arrested on human trafficking charges.

              • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Sucks that it is happening. The second we put those people on a bus America has an obligation to them as the people who have purposefully done them harm. They aren’t just migrants anymore they are victims.

              • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yeah and California already has a border with Mexico, so it’s not like “sharing the burden” is a legitimate argument. Texas just wants to stick its thumb in California’s eye.

                  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Ah, because Texas, where housing is supposedly cheap, doesn’t have enough housing for everyone? Texas, where the taxes are low and there aren’t adequate public services, can’t provide for their own homeless population? Texas, where teen girls are forced into childbirth, can’t offer support the underprivileged children produced by this policy?

            • kaputt@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes, using human lives as a political hot potato is despicable. However, the policy it implies (sharing the burden of caring for immigrants) is actually quite reasonable, and already policy in places like Germany.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Looking at the graph, it’s well over 3x what it was in 2021…seems pretty obvious to me why this might be concerning.

          • David_Eight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            During Covid the government enacted title 42 and didn’t allow any migrants entry to mitigate the spread of covid. Since covid is over they rescinded title 42, now all the asylum seekers waiting at the boarder are crossing as they would have just been turned away before. This was a predictable outcome and next year the numbers will drop back down.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              An interesting point and I would be curious to see if it would pan out.

            • TheOriginalGregToo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              What do you make of people coming from continents besides South America? Do we owe it to Russian or Chinese citizens to offer them asylum? From my perspective asylum is something you offer your direct neighbors who are fleeing threats on their lives. Offering asylum to literally any citizen of the world seems a bit extreme. If someone in China fears for their life, certainly there are closer and more accessible countries they can flee to.