• NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    How about we ban companies like Blackstone from buying up all the auction homes, lightly flipping them and then putting them back on the market as overpriced rentals?

    They’re a big reason for our housing shortage.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why not both? Airbnb severely increases prices, and properties bought by corporations do the same. I’m tired of not doing anything because "what about "

    • Octavio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      What about if we crowdfund a competitor to blackstone that rents out the houses at like a 20% discount to market rate and earmark a portion of rent collected each month for the tenants to have an equity stake in the property. Then more people would want to rent from us and eventually the vampires would lose interest. I wonder if something like that would be possible. Instead of legislating them out, we buy them out. But it does require a critical mass of people willing to set aside a bit of money that they don’t expect a market return on. But maybe if they thought of it more as charity.

      • mob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, besides the fact that I imagine most people in the target audience would rather buy their first house than crowdfund discounted rental rates…

        Do you pinky swear that once you overtake Blackstone , the 150 billion dollar company, you’ll have the same intentions?

        • Octavio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s the flaw in the slaw, I guess. No matter how carefully you craft the by-laws, once it gets big enough, someone will figure out a way to hi-kack it to concentrate wealth.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Boromir: But it is a gift. A gift to the foes of Mordor. Why not use this Ring? Long has my father, the Steward of Gondor, kept the forces of Mordor at bay. By the blood of our people are your lands kept safe! Give Gondor the weapon of the enemy! Let us use it against him!”

          Strider: You cannot wield it. None of us can. The One Ring answers to Sauron alone. It has no other master."


          Trying to fight and compete with a system that thrives on greed using its own tools and rules requires the ruthless use of greed to compete, and greed has a way of warping ones’ heart to continue forever justifying itself until its host is left an empty husk, having made a barren wasteland of all they hoped to save.

          Capital knows its masters, and it will not be wielded by people who would subvert its influence.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The sad fact is that it is actually a good idea that should be implemented more often but the banks have worked very hard (i.e. spent millions on propaganda and lawmaking) to sow distrust in credit unions.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Any industry based on scarce resources or monopolies should be strictly regulated and given profit caps. Land is limited so corporations should not be able to monopolize that land for boundless profits.