glowie@h4x0r.host to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoMozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefoxwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down114cross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlineprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansapple@lemmit.onlinefirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefoxwww.theverge.comglowie@h4x0r.host to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlineprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansapple@lemmit.onlinefirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·10 months agoPresumably rejecting them? It’s the legitimate toggle that gets me though. How do 400 partners require access to my browsing information in order for your site to run?
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 months agoThat’s the obvious bullshit lol, exactly
minus-squareAdanisi@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-210 months agoI think you can configure it but I have mine set to reject them all. But yeah the excuses are absurd. This tracking is not only not necessary, it’s also wrong.
Presumably rejecting them? It’s the legitimate toggle that gets me though. How do 400 partners require access to my browsing information in order for your site to run?
That’s the obvious bullshit lol, exactly
I think you can configure it but I have mine set to reject them all.
But yeah the excuses are absurd. This tracking is not only not necessary, it’s also wrong.