We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Asks AI to generate copyrighted image; AI generates a copyrighted image.

    Pikatchu.jpg

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is a point against those “it’s just like humans learning” arguments.

      • McArthur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean if you asked a human to draw a copyrighted image you would also get the copyrighted image. If the human had seen that copyrighted image enough times they might even have memorised The smallest details and give you a really good or near perfect copy.

        I agree with your point but this example does not prove it.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          …and they are also infringing copyright if they have not been given a right to copy that work.

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Maybe you weren’t trying to make the point I thought you were.

              I assumed you were trying to say that a human can draw a picture of (for example) the Joaquin Phoenix Joker and not be committing copyright infringement, therefore an AI can do the same. I was pointing out that the basis of that argument is false. A human drawing that would be infringing the copyright.

        • realharo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not from memory, without looking at the original during painting - at least not to this level of detail. No human will just incidentally “learn” to draw such a near-perfect copy. Not unless they’re doing it on purpose with the explicit goal of “learn to re-create this exact picture”. Which does not describe how any humans typically learn.